« Scriptural interpretation | Main | Whom Do You Trust? »

April 25, 2006


I am in the middle of reading Chesterton's The Man Who Was Thursday.  I have read a lot of his other stuff but not that one yet.  I haven't finished it yet, but I understand why "Doctor Thursday" likes it so much.  As in many of his other writings he has skewered the vices of the modern world with prescient precision.  Here is a passage that struck me as having a great deal of relevance to the way things stand today.  If you don't have a little of this in you, you probably know someone who does:

Gabriel Syme was not merely a detective who pretended to be a poet; he was really a poet who had become a detective. Nor was his hatred of anarchy hypocritical.  He was one of those who are driven early in life into too conservative an attitude by the bewildering folly of most revolutionists.  He had not attained it by any tame tradition.  His respectability was spontaneous and sudden, a rebellion against rebellion.  He came of a family of cranks, in which all the oldest people had all the newest notions.  One of his uncles always walked about without a hat, and another had made an unsuccessful attempt to walk about with a hat and nothing else.  His father cultivated art and self-realisation; his mother went in for simplicity and hygiene.  Hence the child, during his tenderer years, was wholly unacquainted with any drink between the extremes of absinth and cocoa, of both of which he had a healthy dislike.  The more his mother preached a more than Puritan abstinence the more did his father expand into a more than pagan latitude; and by the time the former had come to enforcing vegetarianism, the latter had pretty well reached the point of defending cannibalism.

Being surrounded with every conceivable kind of revolt from infancy, Gabriel had to revolt into something, so he revolted into the only thing left--sanity.  But there was just enough in him of the blood of these fanatics to make even his protest for common sense a little too fierce to be sensible.  His hatred of modern lawlessness had been crowned also by an accident.  It happened that he was
walking in a side street at the instant of a dynamite outrage.  He had been blind and deaf for a moment, and then seen, the smoke clearing, the broken windows and the bleeding faces.  After that he went about as usual--quiet, courteous, rather gentle; but there was a spot on his mind that was not sane.  He did not regard anarchists, as most of us do, as a handful of morbid men, combining ignorance with intellectualism.  He regarded them as a huge and pitiless peril, like a Chinese invasion. 

He poured perpetually into newspapers and their waste-paper baskets a torrent of tales, verses and violent articles, warning men of this deluge of barbaric denial.  But he seemed to be getting no nearer his enemy, and, what was worse, no nearer a living.  As he paced the Thames embankment, bitterly biting a cheap cigar and brooding on the advance of Anarchy, there was no anarchist with a bomb in his pocket so savage or so solitary as he.  Indeed, he always felt that Government stood alone and desperate, with its back to the wall.  He was too quixotic to have cared
for it otherwise.

Posted by Thomas A. on April 25, 2006 at 03:57 PM | Permalink


TrackBack URL for this entry:

Listed below are links to weblogs that reference Thursday:


The comments to this entry are closed.